- #BENCHMARKS DELETED GEEKBENCH OVER CHEATING ALLEGATIONS FULL#
- #BENCHMARKS DELETED GEEKBENCH OVER CHEATING ALLEGATIONS ANDROID#
- #BENCHMARKS DELETED GEEKBENCH OVER CHEATING ALLEGATIONS PRO#
- #BENCHMARKS DELETED GEEKBENCH OVER CHEATING ALLEGATIONS SERIES#
Problem was they didn't notify users about it or give them choice and that's where "battery gate" came from, not all the stuff people make up here.Īnd only reason there was lawsuit and they paid it because it's a big American company.
#BENCHMARKS DELETED GEEKBENCH OVER CHEATING ALLEGATIONS FULL#
They weren't doing this on phones with good batteries to imply planned obsolescence and if you replaced battery, you restored full performance. Phone isn't as fast, but it's still usable and wouldn't shut down anymore. Without chipset slowdown, phones were turning off and Apple mitigated that by simply slowing down chipset so it doesn't pull as much amps from battery to cause a shutdown. All the complaining came from lack of communication about the feature.
#BENCHMARKS DELETED GEEKBENCH OVER CHEATING ALLEGATIONS ANDROID#
Not that you Android fans would know what's like to use phone for 5+ years when you lose software support after just 2 but anyways. How the frigging hell was Apple "caught" degrading battery when they were doing performance degrading IN RESPONSE to battery degradation which comes with age and usage. moreOh god, just proves you people have absolutely no clue what batterygate was even about yet you all harp about it endlessly like donkeys. Nobody pays 125 million dollar for no reason. This resulted in artificially inflated scores that users would not see during real-world usage.Anonymous, Battery gate drama was entirely different. This is reminiscent of when the company was caught pushing the OnePlus 5's performance capabilities when the OS detected a benchmark app. While this may impact the devices' performance in some benchmarking apps, our focus as always is to do what we can to improve the performance of the device for our users." This has helped to provide a smooth experience while reducing power consumption. As a result of this feedback, our R&D team has been working over the past few months to optimize the devices' performance when using many of the most popular apps, including Chrome, by matching the app's processor requirements with the most appropriate power.
#BENCHMARKS DELETED GEEKBENCH OVER CHEATING ALLEGATIONS PRO#
Following the launch of the OnePlus 9 and 9 Pro in March, some users told us about some areas where we could improve the devices' battery life and heat management. OnePlus issued a statement to Android Authority addressing the matter: "Our top priority is always delivering a great user experience with our products, based in part on acting quickly on important user feedback.
#BENCHMARKS DELETED GEEKBENCH OVER CHEATING ALLEGATIONS SERIES#
We found that the OnePlus 9 series limits the performance of Google Chrome while older OnePlus phones do not. In some of our own testing, we found that AnandTech's data is on the mark. Geekbench called Oxygen OS's behavior a form of "benchmark manipulation." OnePlus has yet to issue a statement on the matter. After conducting its own investigation, Geekbench recently announced that it has removed all OnePlus 9 benchmarks from its charts. Geekbench, one of the more popular benchmarking sites, took these allegations seriously. According to the team's research, Oxygen OS apparently limits the performance of some popular Android apps - but none of those apps are benchmark suites. Android Authority reports: Yesterday, AnandTech posted some information about "weird behavior" it spotted with the OnePlus 9 Pro. Popular benchmark site Geekbench has removed OnePlus 9 benchmarks from its charts due to allegations that the company designed Oxygen OS optimization tools in such a way that they could be viewed as cheating.
0 kommentar(er)
